TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of 10.01%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $301.97, signalling downside risk potential of -6.46%. On the other hand Harley-Davidson has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 22.65%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.468, which suggesting that the stock is 146.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.502%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harley-Davidson offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 177.01x while Harley-Davidson's PE ratio is 8.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 11.80x versus 0.64x for Harley-Davidson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of -155.79%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $301.97, signalling downside risk potential of -6.46%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 16.48%. Given that Lucid Group has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Lucid Group is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.468, which suggesting that the stock is 146.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 177.01x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 11.80x versus 6.56x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of -43.95%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $301.97, signalling downside risk potential of -6.46%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.87 which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.468, which suggesting that the stock is 146.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 177.01x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 11.80x versus 2.90x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 2.12% compared to Tesla's net margin of -0.07%. Tesla's return on equity of 9.1% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $301.97, signalling downside risk potential of -6.46%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $43.33 which suggests that it could grow by 38.93%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.468, which suggesting that the stock is 146.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.391%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 4.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $19.3B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $620.2M. Tesla's net income of $409M is higher than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 177.01x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 11.80x versus 0.33x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.